
Disclaimer
The views expressed by the contributors to this website are for the purposes of education and debate. They should not be regarded as formal legal advice nor used for that purpose.
In addition to the disclaimer, readers of this material are asked to note that the contents are historic and may not represent current law or practice.
Recent Posts
- To treat, or not to treat, that is the question – March 14th 2024
- Complete Council Pro-Vide Law – Mild TBI; Is it all in your head?
- GP Claims: Pit Falls, Traps and NICE Guidelines
- Material contribution to damage applies to indivisible injuries, but how?
- Law & Epidemiological Evidence: Double, Toil & Trouble University of Western Australia Law Review, Vol 49 Issue 1
Costs consequences of late acceptance of a Defendant’s downgraded offer
Recoverability of agent fees… the battle goes on by Andi Barnes
“Honesty is for the most part less profitable than dishonesty.”
Contribution and Apportionment: Unruly Horses? An article by Charles Feeny and Sam Irving for PI Brief Update Law Journal
Reaney – the yet to be resolved questions
Dust-Clouds and Dustbins: Should There Be a Regularity Requirement for Dust Exposure When Defining ‘Substantial’ Under Section 63 (1) Factories Act 1961?
WARNE v VINTERS-ARMSTRONGS [2016] EWHC 1971 (QB); AN EXPOSURE OF SUBSTANCE
Chronic Pain, vulnerable or inevitable? Bagaley v Chesterfield Hospitals
Does clinical negligence litigation have a role in patient safety?
Will the BSB ABS bring Trial Lawyers to the UK?