Disclaimer
The views expressed by the contributors to this website are for the purposes of education and debate. They should not be regarded as formal legal advice nor used for that purpose.
In addition to the disclaimer, readers of this material are asked to note that the contents are historic and may not represent current law or practice.
Recent Posts
- MATERIAL CONTRIBUTION: LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL?
- To treat, or not to treat, that is the question – March 14th 2024
- Complete Council Pro-Vide Law – Mild TBI; Is it all in your head?
- GP Claims: Pit Falls, Traps and NICE Guidelines
- Material contribution to damage applies to indivisible injuries, but how?
IS IT TIME TO DISREGARD DE MINIMIS?
SUPREME COURT GIVES ENCOURAGEMENT TO CLAIMANTS IN CONSENT CASES
The Mitchell Table
You have been Mitchelled? (Part 2) 7 Pillars of Wisdom
You have been Mitchelled? (Part 1)
Crossover Issues for the PI & COP Practitioner: a view from the middle Joint Meeting APIL NORTH WEST REGIONAL GROUP & COURT OF PROTECTION PRACTITIONERS ASSOCIATION
Habeas corpus? Body or evidence? The AvMA Medical & Legal Journal (2013) Vol. 19 Issue 2 pages 42-45
The Dust Settles? Fairchild to Williams (2013) 21 Tort L Rev 87
Paula Thomas v Paul Curley [2013] EWCA Civ 117: A clinical and legal commentary on the judgment of the Court of Appeal
The Trolls that lurk under the Employment Bridge… Social Media in Employment Law