Entries by Charles Feeny

Why LITIGATE when you can MEDIATE?

Could mediation be a solution for councils and other public bodies to resolve disputes? Mediation is a form of alternative dispute resolution that has been around for a long time; in fact it dates back to Roman times. A mediator is neither a judge nor an arbitrator, nor even a chairperson. A mediator acts as […]

Whittington Hospitals NHS Trust v XX (2020 ) UKSC 1

The triumph of identity over collectivism? On 1 April 2020, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of Whittington Hospital NHS Trust v. XX [2020] UKSC 14.  This inevitably controversial judgment received scant media attention at the time, given the commencement of the Lockdown.  It is likely that the decision will be the […]

Litigation: when is it time to get up close and personal?

The recent surge in digital communication is obviously a reaction to the lockdown. The interesting question is whether this will be a temporary phenomenon, or rather what might be seen as an overdue sea change in the use of technology in the law. The technology which can be used to conduct meetings and indeed court […]

Association versus causation: epidemiology versus the law? Part II

Pro-Vide Law will be hosting a follow up event to the Seminar at Wadham College Oxford on 11th July. The seminar in July was well received by those who attended.  A quite excellent seminar today at Wadham College, Oxford, on Epidemiology and causation with some seriously impressive speakers. Thank you.  The speakers were all hugely […]

Association v.Causation: Epidemiology v. the Law?

Thursday 6th February 2020 Venue: DWF 20 Fenchurch Street, London, EC3M 3AG Time: 4pm – 7pm RSVP emma.wall@completecounsel.co.uk Following the successful seminar at Wadham College in July, a follow up event has now been arranged. DWF have kindly agreed to host this event at their London office at Fenchurch Street on 6th February 2020 commencing […]

RSA v Bothnia – Conceding the Frame?

[fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”yes” overflow=”visible”][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”no” center_content=”no” min_height=”none”] On 8th March, the Court of Appeal made an Order by Consent dismissing the Claimant’s Appeal against the judgment of His Honour Judge Brian Rawlings (https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2018/1237.html). The circumstances in which this […]

RSA v GENERALI – LIFE IN THE ENCLAVE?

HHJ Brian Rawlings on 15thMay 2018 handed down judgement in this case. Michael Kent QC and Peter Houghton instructed by Plexus appeared for the Claimant; Charles Feeny, instructed by Hill Dickinson appeared for the Defendant.  Mr Merritt worked for a painting and decorating company (Alick Whittle Limited) between 1975 and 1985, during which time he […]

2018 Social History of Medicine Conference

Charles Feeny has been invited to speak at the 2018 Social History of Medicine Conference “Conformity, Resistance Dialogue and Deviance in Health and Medicine” at the University of Liverpool in July 2018. Charles Feeny will be participating in a round table discussion on Primodos chaired by Jesse Olszynko-Gryn of the University of Cambridge. Primodos was […]