Archives

Articles

Costs consequences of late acceptance of a Defendant’s downgraded offer

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/LL-March.png 415 640 Michelle Fanneran https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Michelle Fanneran2019-03-18 21:43:212019-05-02 11:46:51Costs consequences of late acceptance of a Defendant’s downgraded offer

Recoverability of agent fees… the battle goes on by Andi Barnes

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Screen-Shot-2019-01-07-at-12.44.34.png 635 748 Pro VIDE Law Admin https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Pro VIDE Law Admin2019-01-07 12:49:432019-05-02 11:46:51Recoverability of agent fees… the battle goes on by Andi Barnes

“Honesty is for the most part less profitable than dishonesty.”

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/plato.png 706 564 James Byrne https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg James Byrne2018-03-26 21:46:532019-05-02 11:46:51“Honesty is for the most part less profitable than dishonesty.”

Contribution and Apportionment: Unruly Horses? An article by Charles Feeny and Sam Irving for PI Brief Update Law Journal

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg 0 0 Charles Feeny https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Charles Feeny2018-02-15 22:24:372019-05-02 11:46:52Contribution and Apportionment: Unruly Horses? An article by Charles Feeny and Sam Irving for PI Brief Update Law Journal

Reaney – the yet to be resolved questions

Dust-Clouds and Dustbins: Should There Be a Regularity Requirement for Dust Exposure When Defining ‘Substantial’ Under Section 63 (1) Factories Act 1961?

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg 0 0 Charles Feeny https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Charles Feeny2016-09-05 05:00:562019-05-02 11:46:53Dust-Clouds and Dustbins: Should There Be a Regularity Requirement for Dust Exposure When Defining ‘Substantial’ Under Section 63 (1) Factories Act 1961?

WARNE v VINTERS-ARMSTRONGS [2016] EWHC 1971 (QB); AN EXPOSURE OF SUBSTANCE

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/sparks.jpg 394 394 Charles Feeny https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Charles Feeny2016-08-16 09:54:192019-05-02 11:46:53WARNE v VINTERS-ARMSTRONGS [2016] EWHC 1971 (QB); AN EXPOSURE OF SUBSTANCE

Chronic Pain, vulnerable or inevitable? Bagaley v Chesterfield Hospitals

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/capsule-pill-health-medicine-large.jpg 593 890 Charles Feeny https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Charles Feeny2016-08-08 10:45:082019-05-02 11:46:53Chronic Pain, vulnerable or inevitable? Bagaley v Chesterfield Hospitals

Does clinical negligence litigation have a role in patient safety?

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/pexels-photo-large.jpg 593 890 Nicola Whitehill https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Nicola Whitehill2016-08-02 11:08:352019-05-02 11:46:53Does clinical negligence litigation have a role in patient safety?

Will the BSB ABS bring Trial Lawyers to the UK?

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/316.jpg 270 360 Charles Feeny https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Charles Feeny2016-07-11 21:47:122019-05-02 11:46:53Will the BSB ABS bring Trial Lawyers to the UK?

Page 2 of 3123

Case Notes

“Successful” claimant’s costs recovery restricted to 6.7% of budget

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/hospital.jpeg 650 867 Michelle Fanneran https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Michelle Fanneran2017-03-26 21:36:412019-05-02 11:46:52“Successful” claimant’s costs recovery restricted to 6.7% of budget

PD v RLBUH NHS T (2016) – Reasonable Reconstruction or Speculation in Surgical Negligence?

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/pexels-photo-236066.jpeg 620 940 Charles Feeny https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Charles Feeny2017-03-23 21:27:542019-05-02 11:46:52PD v RLBUH NHS T (2016) – Reasonable Reconstruction or Speculation in Surgical Negligence?

McGeer v McIntosh: Paving a safer way for cyclists? (Number 2)

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg 0 0 Charles Feeny https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Charles Feeny2017-02-28 13:03:252019-05-02 11:46:52McGeer v McIntosh: Paving a safer way for cyclists? (Number 2)

De minimis or material? – The survival of the false dichotomy in industrial disease cases – Carder v Secretary of State for Health [2016] EWCA Civ 790

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/sep16.png 469 362 Charles Feeny https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Charles Feeny2016-09-27 10:42:142019-05-02 11:46:53De minimis or material? – The survival of the false dichotomy in industrial disease cases – Carder v Secretary of State for Health [2016] EWCA Civ 790

Williams v Bermuda Hospitals Board: The search goes on?

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/untitled.png 171 294 Charles Feeny https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Charles Feeny2016-02-10 13:23:182019-05-02 11:46:53Williams v Bermuda Hospitals Board: The search goes on?

McGEER v MACINTOSH: PAVING A SAFER WAY FOR CYCLISTS?

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg 0 0 Charles Feeny https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Charles Feeny2015-11-16 13:19:502019-05-02 11:46:54McGEER v MACINTOSH: PAVING A SAFER WAY FOR CYCLISTS?

Proving the Difference?

Zurich Insurance v IEG [2015] UKSC 33

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/images-3-1.jpeg 195 259 Charles Feeny https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Charles Feeny2015-06-05 13:13:172019-05-02 11:46:54Zurich Insurance v IEG [2015] UKSC 33

The Labyrinth of information: the decision in Spencer v Hillingdon Hospital NHS Trust [2015] EWHC 1058 (QB)

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Icarus.jpg 188 268 Charles Feeny https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Charles Feeny2015-05-20 13:10:592019-05-02 11:46:54The Labyrinth of information: the decision in Spencer v Hillingdon Hospital NHS Trust [2015] EWHC 1058 (QB)

Alkaline metal and the heart: Davies v Countess of Chester Hospital [2014] EWHC 4294 (QB)

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Mg.jpg 225 225 Charles Feeny https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Charles Feeny2015-01-07 13:08:532019-05-02 11:46:55Alkaline metal and the heart: Davies v Countess of Chester Hospital [2014] EWHC 4294 (QB)

Page 2 of 4123 4

Webinars

Nothing Found

Sorry, no posts matched your criteria

Events

Cerebral Palsy & Brain Injury Cases – Ensuring you do the best for your client

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/events.jpg 400 750 Pro VIDE Law Admin https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Pro VIDE Law Admin2016-03-16 10:00:102019-05-02 11:46:53Cerebral Palsy & Brain Injury Cases – Ensuring you do the best for your client

Mock Inquest

Too much information?

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/events.jpg 400 750 Pro VIDE Law Admin https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Pro VIDE Law Admin2015-10-01 10:00:082019-05-02 11:46:54Too much information?

Bright White Line Law

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/events.jpg 400 750 Pro VIDE Law Admin https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Pro VIDE Law Admin2015-09-16 21:13:542019-05-02 11:46:54Bright White Line Law

Mesothelioma and breach

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/events.jpg 400 750 Pro VIDE Law Admin https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Pro VIDE Law Admin2015-02-26 10:00:172019-05-02 11:46:55Mesothelioma and breach

Mesothelioma: A new generation of claims

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/events.jpg 400 750 Pro VIDE Law Admin https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Pro VIDE Law Admin2014-10-16 10:00:052019-05-02 11:46:55Mesothelioma: A new generation of claims

Material contribution or inference? Shortcuts to proof in delay of treatment?

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/events.jpg 400 750 Pro VIDE Law Admin https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Pro VIDE Law Admin2014-04-29 21:19:332019-05-02 11:46:55Material contribution or inference? Shortcuts to proof in delay of treatment?

Clinical negligence lecture series

https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/events.jpg 400 750 Pro VIDE Law Admin https://pro-vide-law.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/logo.jpg Pro VIDE Law Admin2014-04-27 21:24:362019-05-02 11:46:56Clinical negligence lecture series

Page 2 of 212

Disclaimer

The views expressed by the contributors to this website are for the purposes of education and debate. They should not be regarded as formal legal advice nor used for that purpose.

In addition to the disclaimer, readers of this material are asked to note that the contents are historic and may not represent current law or practice.

Archives

Disclaimer

Recent Posts