Entries by Charles Feeny

Fundamental dishonesty: spin as law?

The most conspicuous development in 2024 in clinical negligence litigation has been the increasing tendency of Defendants to rely upon allegations of fundamental dishonesty, either as a defence to a primary claim or in related proceedings for contempt of court.    Two cases in 2024, not cases of clinical negligence but nonetheless relevant to such […]

MATERIAL CONTRIBUTION: LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL?

MATERIAL CONTRIBUTION: LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL? The decision of the Court of Appeal in Zgonec-Rozej and Others v Pereira can be seen as a further step in providing clarity in the difficult area of how causation in tort is proved by material contribution to damage without invoking the Fairchild exception.   The […]

Law & Epidemiological Evidence: Double, Toil & Trouble University of Western Australia Law Review, Vol 49 Issue 1

In late February 2019, I had lunch at Wadham College, Oxford, with Professors Carl Heneghan and Sandy Steel to discuss aseminar on epidemiological evidence and the law. Almost exactly three years later, the results of this seminar at Wadham in July 2019 and a subsequent seminar at DWF London in February 2020 have been encapsulated […]

Bolam v Montgomery: Where Does Medicine End & Law Begin?

Date: Friday 10th November 2023 Location: The Municipal Hotel, Dale Street, Liverpool, L2 2DH Your Speakers: Following the decision of the Supreme Court in McCulloch v Forth Valley Health Board the time seems right to consider (or reconsider) the principles underlying consent to treatment. The extent to which the law requires clinicians to adopt an […]