Entries by Charles Feeny

Macarthy v Marks & Spencer [2014] EWHC 3183 (QB)

Case Background Mr Heward died of mesothelioma aged 61. Mr Heward started working for this father’s company aged 16 as a trainee draughtsman and subsequently rose to the position of Managing Director in 1981 upon his father’s death. D H Allan & Sons (the third party) undertook shop fittings and were responsible for maintenance of […]

Explaining the unexplainable? Shovelton v Central Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust & PE v Royal Liverpool University Hospital

Case Background Shovelton v Central Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust In November 2007 the Claimant underwent a carotid endarterectomy intended to lessen the risk of suffering a stroke. Unfortunately, while the operation was a success in that the Claimant avoided having a stroke, the Claimant suffered complications from the surgery. The Claimant was left […]

The Mitchell Table

This table contains the cases decided post-Mitchell and arranges them according to subject matter and whether the decision of the court is considered strict to Mitchell or not. Where appropriate a short comment will be included but the primary focus of the table is to provide an accessible means of matching cases to the subject […]

You have been Mitchelled? (Part 2) 7 Pillars of Wisdom

In this article we seek to address the possible ways that litigants can avoid being Mitchelled. To date, we have identified 7 possible ways this can achieved which, with a little irony, we have called the seven pillars of wisdom (‘Wisdom hath builded her house, she hath hewn out her seven pillars’ (Proverbs 9:1), subsequently […]

You have been Mitchelled? (Part 1)

The origin of the word “pleb” is ancient and therefore understandably obscure. The distinction between plebs and patrician seems to go back to the earliest days of the Roman Republic. By the time of the late Republic, the distinction was arcane and Plebeians had risen to important and influential positions in Roman society. Such seminal […]

Amaca Pty Ltd v Ellis [2010] HCA 5- The synergistic relationship between tobacco and asbestos

Case Background In this note Charles Feeny and Professor Damien McElvenny of the Institute of Occupational Medicine discuss the legal and epidemiological reasoning behind synergy. The synergistic relationship between tobacco and asbestos was considered in the Australian case of Amaca Pty Ltd v Ellis [fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”yes” overflow=”visible”][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” […]

Breach of duty in historic hearing loss cases – adverse inferences

Case Background Keefe -v- Isle of Man Steam Packet Company Limited [2010] EWCA Civ 683 Shawe-Lincoln -v- Dr. Arul Chezhayan Neelakandan [2012] EWHC 1150 (QB) Heavey -v- TMD Friction Limited, Wakefield County Court, 25th October 2012, HHJ Cockcroft, Lawtel report 14 November 2013. Contributor Comments All of these cases concern the difficulties faced by Claimants in proving […]