Material contribution or inference? Shortcuts to proof in delay of treatment?

[fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”yes” overflow=”visible”][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”no” center_content=”no” min_height=”none”][fusion_map address=”100 Old Hall Street, Liverpool, UK” type=”roadmap” map_style=”default” overlay_color=”” infobox=”default” infobox_background_color=”” infobox_text_color=”” infobox_content=”” icon=”” width=”100%” height=”300px” zoom=”14″ scrollwheel=”yes” scale=”yes” zoom_pancontrol=”yes” animation=”yes” popup=”yes” class=”” id=””][/fusion_map][fusion_text]

Date & Time

Date: 29/04/2014
Time: 5:00 am – 6:00 am
Location: Hill Dickinson Liverpool, Old Hall Street

Event description

Lecture addressing the problems that arise in cases of delayed treatment. Specific reference to cauda equina syndrome and the possible importance of Bailey v MoD.[/fusion_text][/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *